Re: You might be right about that

> I guess so! If the site you linked to is yours, you must have read a ton
> of eBooks.

Nope. Not my site. As stated in another thread (not sure if you saw it), I found it in the archives here on FIB so I decided to put it in my link. Thought it was a good, useful site since it's free. I'm sure there are things on the site that some people won't like, but really, what can I do? Do you have a solution?

> Of course who ever wrote this does not identify themselves on the website.
> To me that shows a lack of credibility.

> One of the first things I look for on a website is an "about us"
> page. I like to know who I am doing business with.

OK. I agree with knowing who you are doing business with. But I just got done looking at the site again and I do not see anything being sold. So tell me, how did you plan on "doing business" with the site??? There is nothing to buy as far as I can tell. Looks to me that it's just a content site. Can you explain what you meant by "doing business"? Did you think about buying the site, perhaps?

> I'd like to think that a man of morals and high
> integrity wouldn't sell his soul for an adsense click.

Adsense ads cannot be controlled by the webmaster. Not sure if you know that. SO basically, when you decide to display contextually targeted ads you have to assume That not all of the links will jive with your site or your "morals". Not sure if that means you are "selling your soul" but not sure that I care. People have to make money. the person who put that site up was, I am assuming, attempting to let people learn about IM for free. He has to get paid somehow. Hosting a site costs money, in case you didn;t know. But really, I have no clue about the motives of the site owner. I just think that tall in all, from what I have seen, it looks like a helpful site so I put it in my link. I thought it was better than just the same old affiliate link. How can you trust and affiliate link, for the most part, I'm just trying to help spread good, useful info. Sue me. LOL.

> Of course it isn't up to me to decide if you're guilty by association to
> that site. Not that I'm a religious man, but:

> You should tend to your "own patch of weeds" without throwing
> them over the fence into your neighbors backyard.

Naw. I hate gardening. I just mow the weds over with my mower. No need to be rude and throw them in the neighbor's yard. That ain't my style.

But I would like to thank you for chastising me for linking to a free content site that I don't own. Do you always like to waste your time like this, Steve. Don't care if you do, really. But just wondering.

> Especially after I saw one of the adsense ads that promotes them bad
> people up north.

Sigh, Steve. Sigh, sigh, sigh.

It is obvious that you were offended by my post about Canadian and Australian marketers. Sorry, man. I told everyone 2 or 3 times in that post that I meant no offense to citizens of either of those countries as it was not about the citizens in general but rather the internet marketers. Sorry you still took offense. But I can't help ya, man. That's something that only you can help yourself with. I never said that Canadians are bad people. You said that, Steve.