♦ REFRESH to rotate MAAMAW'S CLICKY NOTES thru this space..... Timely Tips, Best of the Boards & More ♦ |
Be sure to visit the Current Message Board when you're finished here. We're very friendly, so don't be shy... just jump right in and post your question. Scams outnumber legitimate biz ops about a bzillion to one, so it's well worth your time. |
| View Thread | Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg | |
---|
FIB - Scams 101 - Ye Olde Archives
Posted By: Bill Carton - the Roadie <wcarton@flash.net> In Response To: Re: Roadie, roadie, roadie... (BenV)
Thursday, 2 February 2006, at 9:54 a.m.
> I have to chime in here... Out of every 10 people faced with an unethical
> situation where their job "security" is on the line, 7 are
> likely to "go with the flow". Out of those same 7, 5 would
> likely return a wallet to the owner with cash in tact. There are different
> levels of response to ethics questions, it isn't alway black and white.
Agreed. But these are employees who have ALREADY applied and been hired knowing the company is privately held, owned by a Marine who served in Vietnam and who founded Parsons Technology in 1994 (you might remember their products), and who has declared he's not going to offshore their jobs to India or elsewhere to save an additional buck. This generates a bit of loyalty.
> Now, for you to make a blanket statement about Developers being
> "good"
To be precise, I said: "Developers also have a sense of ethics." You're saying that sense might be bad.
> I can outright say that you are wrong.
I'm discussing GoDaddy culture and ethical guidance with a bit of inside knowledge, and you're expanding the straw-man argument to the entire population of developers. Of course, you can win that modified argument. Feel free.
> Who developed the
> pop-up ad?
Ethically-challenged scumbag low-life Internet abusing developers. Not GoDaddy employees. Not anybody I work with.
> Who developed the auto-responder?
Any number of people. If it was patentable, it would have been patented. Are autoresponders evil? Or are users who apply them to harvested address lists the evil ones?
> Who developed the link
> between a spider-bot and auto-responder (mass spam generator)?
Ethically-challenged scumbag low-life Internet abusing developers.
My, what a lively discussion we have going on the ethics of Internet abuse. Entire college level classes are taught on this exact subject.
| View Thread | Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg | |
---|
FIB - Scams 101 - Ye Olde Archives is maintained with WebBBS 3.11.
|
PLEASE READ THIS LEGAL NOTICE CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU FILE A LAWSUIT OR EVEN WASTE TIME THINKING ABOUT IT. It has been done before, but never successfully. In fact, the last dodobird who tried it ended up being ordered to pay more than $77,000 in attorney fees ($65,000+ to my attorneys and $12,000+ to my co-defendant's legal advisor).
If your attorney is worth his salt, he's going to tell you that the expense of filing a lawsuit you can't win is a whole lot worse than any "damages" resulting from messages posted on this insignificant little chunk of cyberspace. NEWS FLASH: I didn't just climb down off that ol' turnip truck yesterday. I'm well aware that expressing a negative opinion, relating one's personal experience, and restating provable facts are all legal in this country and do not constitute libel, slander, or defamation -- so you don't want to play games with me, and you sure don't want to start something you aren't prepared to finish. I don't take threats lightly, and I don't accept bribes (or did you call it a "mutually-beneficial arrangement"?). I'll turn you in faster than you can yell, "ARREST ME, I'M SCUM!!" Do yourself a favor and turn your legal team loose in greener pastures. Although we may, from time to time, monitor or review discussions, postings and the like on the Friends In Business (Scams 101) Message Board, we are under no obligation to do so. We are not responsible or liable for any claim arising from the content of any such discussions or postings or for any error, defamation, libel, slander, omission, falsehood, obscenity, pornography, profanity, danger, or inaccuracy contained in any information contained within such locations on the Site. You are prohibited from posting or transmitting any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, scandalous, inflammatory, pornographic, or profane materials or any material that could constitute or encourage conduct that would be considered a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwise violate any law. You are likewise prohibited from posting any false claims against any company or individual. We will fully cooperate with any law enforcement authorities or court order requesting or directing us to disclose the identity of anyone posting any such information or materials. By posting messages and/or content on the Friends In Business (Scams 101) Message Board, you give permission for Lesley Fountain/Friends In Business/Shoestring Success Publications to display, distribute and use the posting and content for publication, advertising, promotion, excerption or example. You grant Lesley Fountain/Friends In Business/Shoestring Success Publications complete, perpetual, but non-exclusive rights to use, archive, reproduce, adapt, modify, distribute, sub-license, repurpose, rework, compile, or offer for sale or resale the messages, postings or content appearing on this site in whole or in part, throughout the world and universe, on a royalty-free basis without remuneration. If you cannot accept or agree with the terms of service for this website and discussion board, you are advised not to post on this board. In closing, I would like to remind you once again that it is still legal, in this great country of ours, to express a PERSONAL OPINION, as long as it is presented as opinion and not as fact. And finally, all you scammers out there will do well to remember that TRUTH IS AN ABSOLUTE DEFENSE against charges of libel, defamation, and slander... so if you're operating just a hop, skip, and jump ahead of the law, you might want to think twice before doing anything stupid... (AND SHAME ON YOU!!). |