REFRESH to rotate MAAMAW'S CLICKY NOTES thru this space..... Timely Tips, Best of the Boards & More



You'll find great information in this "Read Only" Archive, but remember..... things change.
Be sure to visit the Current Message Board when you're finished here.

We're very friendly, so don't be shy... just jump right in and post your question.
Scams outnumber legitimate biz ops about a bzillion to one, so it's well worth your time.


| View Thread | Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg |

FIB - Scams 101 - Ye Olde Archives

Check the money flow...

Posted By: Mel. White
Saturday, 21 January 2006, at 9:40 a.m.

In Response To: 12dailypro (Pat)

> My son is wanting to invest into this "scheme" as I call it. I
> just wanted to see if you had any info on it and if you believe it to be a
> scam or money laundering...

You sound as though you've run into some red flags. Your "BadBusiness" alert sense is right on the mark, here. This particular business model was tried some five years ago and collapsed within 8 months.

So let's follow the money trail:
You've got Willing Surfers who pay to get into the program.
You've got Desperate Websites who will pay those surfers to see their website.

Sounds good, right? LAST time it was tried (in at least eight different variations of this same scheme, the Desperate Websites found that people were flocking to them by the thousands... and they were having to pay those surfers.

However, nobody was buying.

The big guys weren't interested in paying to have people surf to their sites. Amazon.com, for all its economic problems in the first 5 years never offered a bounty for people to come look at their site. Instead, they advertised in more effective arenas (radio, tv, newspapers, magazines) and did other innovative things to gain capital.) Cory Rudl and other long-term business advisors didn't bother paying to have people come to their sites.

So the only ones paying are the desperate. They are not going to continue to shell out money for years and have only 3-4 sales per year. If they become wildly popular, then they're not going to pay for surfers, because they will have better (free) advertising through word of mouth.

Finally, the surfers. This is what collapsed the program last time.

You're in an international marketplace. You can't say "Okay, we're ONLY going to pay the people with incomes of over $30,000/year who are interested in this stuff." Last time, the third world countries (India, Mexico, Korea) hopped on this bandwagon because $5/day is just nearly a week's wages in some of those places.

Word got around fast. Website owners who checked their logs found that they were paying for hundreds of clicks from people who couldn't read English and couldn't afford anything they were selling. College students also got into this with the intention of making extra money... just surf, click on some links, set a timer and wait till you'd been on the site long enough to collect money, and surf away.

Prices for surfing dropped drastically in an effort to make people stay longer and to keep the websites that were paying monthly fees. This had the effect of sending the American surfers away (the pay dropped and the rules changed) but in the third world countries where $2 could feed a family for several days, word was spreading about this free money that anyone could have by going to a cybercafe and surfing.

Then the autosurf software companies hopped in. You could set your browser to do a timed surf with this software, go off to dinner and collect the price of dinner while you were away from the computer.

The small pay-to-surf ones collapsed quickly. Two of the big ones stumbled onward but the pay got smaller and they eventually collapsed as well.

Oh... and they'd lie about who their customers were, keeping names on the rolls long after the website had quit paying for page views.

This one's got a few hooks (they require you to upgrade and pay more money to surf within the first month) and may be combining it with a ponzi type operation (paying the first members from the new members.)

Anyway... bottom line is that the model has been tried before and they haven't addressed any of the problems that made it collapse last time. It'll run into the same thing IF they ever get it off the ground.

Messages in This Thread

Have you read MAAMAW'S CLICKY NOTES today?
Excuse me... You MISSED them??
At the top o' the page in the blue bars (sheesh!).

| View Thread | Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg |

FIB - Scams 101 - Ye Olde Archives is maintained with WebBBS 3.11.


You'll find great information in this "Read Only" Archive, but remember..... things change.
Be sure to visit the Current Message Board when you're finished here.

We're very friendly, so don't be shy... just jump right in and post your question.
Scams outnumber legitimate biz ops about a bzillion to one, so it's well worth your time.



NOTICE TO SCUMBEEZLES
(you know who you are... you scream "Foul!" when the truth comes out)
        PLEASE READ THIS LEGAL NOTICE CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU FILE A LAWSUIT OR EVEN WASTE TIME THINKING ABOUT IT.  It has been done before, but never successfully.  In fact, the last dodobird who tried it ended up being ordered to pay more than $77,000 in attorney fees ($65,000+ to my attorneys and $12,000+ to my co-defendant's legal advisor).
        If your attorney is worth his salt, he's going to tell you that the expense of filing a lawsuit you can't win is a whole lot worse than any "damages" resulting from messages posted on this insignificant little chunk of cyberspace.
        NEWS FLASH:  I didn't just climb down off that ol' turnip truck yesterday.  I'm well aware that expressing a negative opinion, relating one's personal experience, and restating provable facts are all legal in this country and do not constitute libel, slander, or defamation -- so you don't want to play games with me, and you sure don't want to start something you aren't prepared to finish.  I don't take threats lightly, and I don't accept bribes (or did you call it a "mutually-beneficial arrangement"?).  I'll turn you in faster than you can yell, "ARREST ME, I'M SCUM!!" 
        Do yourself a favor and turn your legal team loose in greener pastures.

        Although we may, from time to time, monitor or review discussions, postings and the like on the Friends In Business (Scams 101) Message Board, we are under no obligation to do so.  We are not responsible or liable for any claim arising from the content of any such discussions or postings or for any error, defamation, libel, slander, omission, falsehood, obscenity, pornography, profanity, danger, or inaccuracy contained in any information contained within such locations on the Site.
        You are prohibited from posting or transmitting any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, scandalous, inflammatory, pornographic, or profane materials or any material that could constitute or encourage conduct that would be considered a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwise violate any law.  You are likewise prohibited from posting any false claims against any company or individual.  We will fully cooperate with any law enforcement authorities or court order requesting or directing us to disclose the identity of anyone posting any such information or materials.
        By posting messages and/or content on the Friends In Business (Scams 101) Message Board, you give permission for Lesley Fountain/Friends In Business/Shoestring Success Publications to display, distribute and use the posting and content for publication, advertising, promotion, excerption or example. You grant Lesley Fountain/Friends In Business/Shoestring Success Publications complete, perpetual, but non-exclusive rights to use, archive, reproduce, adapt, modify, distribute, sub-license, repurpose, rework, compile, or offer for sale or resale the messages, postings or content appearing on this site in whole or in part, throughout the world and universe, on a royalty-free basis without remuneration.  If you cannot accept or agree with the terms of service for this website and discussion board, you are advised not to post on this board.
        In closing, I would like to remind you once again that it is still legal, in this great country of ours, to express a PERSONAL OPINION, as long as it is presented as opinion and not as fact.
        And finally, all you scammers out there will do well to remember that TRUTH IS AN ABSOLUTE DEFENSE against charges of libel, defamation, and slander... so if you're operating just a hop, skip, and jump ahead of the law, you might want to think twice before doing anything stupid... (AND SHAME ON YOU!!).