| ♦ REFRESH to rotate MAAMAW'S CLICKY NOTES thru this space..... Timely Tips, Best of the Boards & More ♦ |
Be sure to visit the Current Message Board when you're finished here. We're very friendly, so don't be shy... just jump right in and post your question. Scams outnumber legitimate biz ops about a bzillion to one, so it's well worth your time. |
| | View Thread | Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg | |
|---|
FIB - Scams 101 - Ye Olde Archives
Posted By: MaaMaw In Response To: Re: FOR CRAPSAKE, MATT!! What part of my post didn't you understand??? (Mazu)
Tuesday, 8 February 2005, at 8:17 a.m.
> Yes I sent you a course and asked for your honest opinion. I never heard
> back from you. You say you didn't like it? How is that being a lady again.
As I recall, we talked about my promoting your course on FIB (as an affiliate). If you simply wanted my opinion, then I apologize for misunderstanding. Your course wasn't new. You had opinions all over the place. I didn't think mine would make a difference one way or the other, and if that's all you were looking for, then like I said, I didn't understand that.
> I got great letters on that course for years I am sure there was something
> you liked about it, It was 600+ pages. That is fine but hearing this from
> you directly is professional. Not, "I am not a fan". That is
> bashing me. You might as well say my stuff "totally sucks".
Yes, of course there were things I liked about it, but I didn't feel it compared favorably to Corey Rudl's course in any way, shape, or form. That's why I chose not to promote it. I probably should have offered to send it back. I'm sorry, but I didn't think about that (and since you contacted me and I didn't contact you, I probably wouldn't have willingly coughed up the postage at that point either).
I'm not being hostile; I have no reason to be hostile (at least I didn't until that "you're too important" comment). I am simply stating my personal opinion.
Saying "I am not a fan" was NOT intended to bash you. I was stating a fact -- that I am not personally a fan of your stuff. That doesn't make it bad, and it is NOT the same as saying your stuff "totally sucks."
I have NEVER said your stuff "totally sucks." I have never said it "sort of sucks." In fact, I have never said it sucks at all.
Since we're talking about this, and since I never gave you the feedback you were apparently looking for, I will tell you now that the hype on your sites bothers me a bit. (It also bothers me on Corey's sites, which is why I tone it down in my own recommendation and why I send *everyone* there first -- so I'm not saying his is good and yours is bad. I'm just saying it bugs me -- and it especially bugs me in relation to the Ecurrency trading.)
> For all the talk on your site from clowns talking about bringnig down
> scams, I am on the front lines. The law suit (yes real suit) I have going
> on will actually stop a big leaguer from suing others and they have sued
> plenty. But I guess you and others don't know anything about this.
I'm not sure what that has to do with anything, but I guess it's a good thing you're doing. And for the record, I have *never* talked about personally "bringing down" scams except in relation to Summit Photographix. I don't claim to be on the front lines when all I am is a mouthpiece.
> We are
> on the same team (at least I though) but I have been wrong on the past.
I have nothing against you, and I never said I did. You're the one who went off the deep end here.
> If your brownies are like your opinions I should probably pass.
They make good grenades.
Luv,
MaaMaw
P.S. If I were "out to get you" and I thought your stuff "totally sucked," I would be zapping your links faster than you can type 'em.
The Absolute BEST and Most COMPREHENSIVE Internet Marketing Course On the Planet