REFRESH to rotate MAAMAW'S CLICKY NOTES thru this space..... Timely Tips, Best of the Boards & More



You'll find great information in this "Read Only" Archive, but remember..... things change.
Be sure to visit the Current Message Board when you're finished here.

We're very friendly, so don't be shy... just jump right in and post your question.
Scams outnumber legitimate biz ops about a bzillion to one, so it's well worth your time.


| View Thread | Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg |

FIB - Scams 101 - Ye Olde Archives

Sad

Posted By: DaveB
Monday, 31 July 2006, at 1:00 p.m.

In Response To: Christian tie-in healthcare scam: FTC obtains injunction (Bill Carton - the Roadie)

I know several people who have legit businesses, make lotsa money, pay their taxes and live large, no worries. I have also known people (some of which I worked for) who wouldn't under any circumstances run a legit business. I guess it's all about getting rich quick and burning as many people as you can. The problem is that a small percentage of these crooks get caught.

DaveB

> http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/07/illegalbus.htm

> For Release: July 31, 2006

> FTC Stops Supposed Preacher, Family, Companies Selling Illegal Business
> Opportunity

> Business Being Peddled Would Violate State and Federal Laws

> A U.S. District Court has barred a purported former preacher, his two
> sons,
> and his companies from selling a healthcare business opportunity promising
> consumers millions of dollars if they participated in an alleged network
> of
> Medicaid providers. In fact, according to the Federal Trade Commission
> complaint, the defendants' business model would have required participants
> to break numerous state and federal laws.

> Using "healthcare conferences" at hotels and convention centers
> across the
> US, the defendants promised consumers that they would receive
> "guaranteed"
> Medicaid patients and would receive help from the lawyers, doctors, and
> other professionals on their staff in establishing their healthcare
> businesses. The FTC charged that the defendants misrepresented the
> assistance they would provide and that participants could legally earn
> money
> from the business, and did not provide participants with the required
> disclosure statement and earnings disclosures for a franchise. A U.S.
> District Court has granted a temporary restraining order, prohibiting the
> defendants' from continuing their deceptive business practices, freezing
> their assets, and appointing a receiver.

> The operation targeted church-going audiences, advertising their upcoming
> conferences on Christian radio and television networks. Their traveling
> road
> show visited at least 18 different US cities, drawing crowds of up to 1000
> attendees, with many persons paying a $65 registration fee to attend. The
> defendants held "conferences" in Atlanta, Baltimore, Durham,
> Chicago,
> Dallas-Ft. Worth, Memphis, Jacksonville, Nashville, Macon, Columbus,
> Georgia, St. Louis, Philadelphia, Jackson, Mississippi, Norfolk, Richmond,
> and Austin.

> At the conferences, individual defendant Jeffrey W. McLain would mix
> references to his alleged career as a preacher with descriptions of the
> huge
> rewards flowing from his business opportunity. The defendants claimed that
> they were millionaires and multimillionaires and that for a $2,495
> investment, participants would have an opportunity to become as rich as
> they
> were. The defendants also ran a telemarketing operation in Marietta,
> Georgia
> through which they sold their business opportunity.

> The defendants instructed participants to incorporate two companies - a
> non-profit organization, such as a church, and a for-profit healthcare
> company which would provide services to Medicaid-eligible clients. The
> defendants stressed to the participants that the ownership of the
> non-profit
> corporation needed to be untraceable to the healthcare company. The
> non-profit would collect donations, such as clothes and furniture, and
> distribute it to those in need, provided they gave the non-profit their
> Medicaid information. The participants were then supposed to funnel the
> Medicaid information to the for-profit medical services company that
> supplies its products or services to the recipient and bills Medicaid. The
> participant also could sell the Medicaid information to other providers
> and
> receive a referral fee between $100 and $500.

> The sales pitch promised that lawyers, doctors, and other professionals
> would be available to guide participants through the incorporation and
> licensing of their two companies through the start-up phase, and would
> remain available to answer questions after the business was running.

> According to the FTC's complaint, the defendants failed to disclose that
> their business model would expose participants to either criminal or civil
> monetary penalties, as it would violate numerous federal and state laws.
> The
> complaint also alleges that they misrepresent that purchasers could
> legally
> make substantial earnings, and that they will receive assistance in
> establishing and managing their business venture. Finally, the FTC charged
> that the defendants failed to provide purchasers with the required
> disclosure statement and made unsubstantiated earnings claims.

> The FTC received assistance in the case from the United States Postal
> Inspection Service in Atlanta, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, and
> investigators from several different offices of the Attorney General,
> including their Medicaid fraud control units, from Maryland, Florida,
> Texas,
> Mississippi, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Virginia.

> The court entered an ex parte temporary restraining order against the
> defendants: Jeffrey Wayne McLain, also known as J.W. McLain; Alexander
> McLain; Victor McLain; Prophet 3H, LLC; Prophet 3H, Inc.; Georgia Home
> Health Care License and Certification Institute, Inc., doing business as
> GHLCI; Healthcare License and Certification Institute, Inc., doing
> business
> as HSLCI and HSLCC; and M7 Holdings, LLC. The FTC is seeking a permanent
> end
> to their deceptive business practices and redress for their victims.

> The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the complaint was 5-0. The
> complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District
> of
> Georgia on July 18, 2006. The temporary restraining order was granted on
> the
> same day. A preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled August 1.

> NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has "reason to
> believe" that
> the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission
> that
> a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or
> ruling that the defendant has actually violated the law. The case will be
> decided by the court.

> Copies of the complaint are available from the FTC's Web site at
> http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTC's Consumer Response Center, Room
> 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The FTC works
> for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business
> practices in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers
> spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish
> (bilingual counselors are available to take complaints), or to get free
> information on any of 150 consumer topics, call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP
> (1-877-382-4357), or use the complaint form at
> http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/complaint.htm. The FTC enters Internet,
> telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into
> Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to thousands of
> civil
> and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.

> MEDIA CONTACT:

> Jacqueline Dizdul,
> Office of Public Affairs
> 202-326-2472

> STAFF CONTACT:

> David R. Spiegel,
> Bureau of Consumer Protection
> 202-326-3281

> (http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2006/07/illegalbus.htm)

On Staying Young

Messages in This Thread

Have you read MAAMAW'S CLICKY NOTES today?
Excuse me... You MISSED them??
At the top o' the page in the blue bars (sheesh!).

| View Thread | Return to Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg |

FIB - Scams 101 - Ye Olde Archives is maintained with WebBBS 3.11.


You'll find great information in this "Read Only" Archive, but remember..... things change.
Be sure to visit the Current Message Board when you're finished here.

We're very friendly, so don't be shy... just jump right in and post your question.
Scams outnumber legitimate biz ops about a bzillion to one, so it's well worth your time.



NOTICE TO SCUMBEEZLES
(you know who you are... you scream "Foul!" when the truth comes out)
        PLEASE READ THIS LEGAL NOTICE CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU FILE A LAWSUIT OR EVEN WASTE TIME THINKING ABOUT IT.  It has been done before, but never successfully.  In fact, the last dodobird who tried it ended up being ordered to pay more than $77,000 in attorney fees ($65,000+ to my attorneys and $12,000+ to my co-defendant's legal advisor).
        If your attorney is worth his salt, he's going to tell you that the expense of filing a lawsuit you can't win is a whole lot worse than any "damages" resulting from messages posted on this insignificant little chunk of cyberspace.
        NEWS FLASH:  I didn't just climb down off that ol' turnip truck yesterday.  I'm well aware that expressing a negative opinion, relating one's personal experience, and restating provable facts are all legal in this country and do not constitute libel, slander, or defamation -- so you don't want to play games with me, and you sure don't want to start something you aren't prepared to finish.  I don't take threats lightly, and I don't accept bribes (or did you call it a "mutually-beneficial arrangement"?).  I'll turn you in faster than you can yell, "ARREST ME, I'M SCUM!!" 
        Do yourself a favor and turn your legal team loose in greener pastures.

        Although we may, from time to time, monitor or review discussions, postings and the like on the Friends In Business (Scams 101) Message Board, we are under no obligation to do so.  We are not responsible or liable for any claim arising from the content of any such discussions or postings or for any error, defamation, libel, slander, omission, falsehood, obscenity, pornography, profanity, danger, or inaccuracy contained in any information contained within such locations on the Site.
        You are prohibited from posting or transmitting any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, scandalous, inflammatory, pornographic, or profane materials or any material that could constitute or encourage conduct that would be considered a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwise violate any law.  You are likewise prohibited from posting any false claims against any company or individual.  We will fully cooperate with any law enforcement authorities or court order requesting or directing us to disclose the identity of anyone posting any such information or materials.
        By posting messages and/or content on the Friends In Business (Scams 101) Message Board, you give permission for Lesley Fountain/Friends In Business/Shoestring Success Publications to display, distribute and use the posting and content for publication, advertising, promotion, excerption or example. You grant Lesley Fountain/Friends In Business/Shoestring Success Publications complete, perpetual, but non-exclusive rights to use, archive, reproduce, adapt, modify, distribute, sub-license, repurpose, rework, compile, or offer for sale or resale the messages, postings or content appearing on this site in whole or in part, throughout the world and universe, on a royalty-free basis without remuneration.  If you cannot accept or agree with the terms of service for this website and discussion board, you are advised not to post on this board.
        In closing, I would like to remind you once again that it is still legal, in this great country of ours, to express a PERSONAL OPINION, as long as it is presented as opinion and not as fact.
        And finally, all you scammers out there will do well to remember that TRUTH IS AN ABSOLUTE DEFENSE against charges of libel, defamation, and slander... so if you're operating just a hop, skip, and jump ahead of the law, you might want to think twice before doing anything stupid... (AND SHAME ON YOU!!).